Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is better in all formats currently?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning spell in the 2nd T20I against India at the MCG, showcasing near-unplayable bowling. His performance with the new ball dismantled the Indian top-order, leaving them shocked and struggling to recover.
Hazlewood ended his spell with impressive figures of 3 for 13 in four overs, dismissing Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma. This exceptional bowling was the main reason India was restricted to just 125 runs.
India relied on their key pacer, Jasprit Bumrah, to perform similarly and lead the team to victory. However, Bumrah conceded runs early, easing the chase for Australia. Although he took two wickets for 26 runs, those dismissals had little impact on the game's outcome.
"Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket; however, the comparison of the recent show from the two bowlers leads us to the question: Is Josh Hazlewood a better all-format bowler than Bumrah?"
Looking at their overall career performances across formats, Jasprit Bumrah stands out as the more effective bowler, maintaining superior averages and strike rates compared to Hazlewood.
Summary
Hazlewood’s outstanding T20I performance questions Bumrah’s dominance, but over their careers, Bumrah remains the more efficient bowler in all formats.
Would you like a more detailed analysis or a focus on their stats?