Amendments proposed by Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the House of Lords must be rejected. Before entering Parliament, I worked in the NHS and served as a steward for my union, UNISON. That experience shaped how I understand workplace fairness and security.
The day after the Commons last debated the Employment Rights Bill, I received a call from an old colleague — let's call her Sally. Her question captured the very essence of this issue:
“If the Employment Rights Bill had been in place two years ago, would I still have my job?”
The answer — yes — is exactly why these Lords amendments must not succeed. Sally’s story is not rare. She was a nurse whose demanding specialty, combined with chronic health problems, made full-time hours impossible. After negotiating with management, she was offered a reasonable adjustment under disability provisions: a special contract.
Sally joined the nurse bank with a zero-hours agreement that let her work a consistent set of weekly hours while maintaining flexibility. This arrangement served both her and the NHS well. It lasted nine years, based on trust and shared commitment — even without formal job guarantees.
Real stories like Sally’s show why Parliament must reject political delay and pass the Employment Rights Bill to protect fair and flexible work opportunities.