According to writer Chris Roemer, the leadership of the Democratic Party is increasingly driven by fear rather than principle. He highlights this by recalling an episode involving actress Jamie Lee Curtis, who appeared on the podcast “WTF with Marc Maron” shortly after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
During that interview, Curtis expressed empathy for Kirk and his family, despite strongly disagreeing with his political views.
“I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say, but I believe he was a man of faith, and I hope in that moment when he died, that he felt connected to his faith, even though his ideas were abhorrent to me.”
“I still believe he’s a father and a husband and a man of faith, and I hope whatever connection to God means that he felt it.”
Her comments caused backlash from many on the political left, particularly those who viewed sympathy for a conservative public figure as unacceptable. Facing the controversy, Curtis later clarified her words to Variety magazine.
“An excerpt of it mistranslated what I was saying as I wished him well — like I was talking about him in a very positive way, which I wasn’t; I was simply talking about his faith in God.”
Roemer argues that Curtis’s need to defend her compassion illustrates a deeper problem within the Democratic Party’s culture — that genuine empathy toward political opponents has become taboo.
The article reflects on the dangers of ideological rigidity within the Democratic Party, arguing that compassion across political divides should not be condemned.