The Dismissal Anniversary and Its Controversy
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when governor-general Sir John Kerr lawfully used a constitutional power to resolve a severe political deadlock and secure government funding for the Crown. Despite acting within his rights, Sir John Kerr has faced relentless criticism, both during his life and posthumously.
Clarifying Sir John Kerr’s Role
It is important to emphasize that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government himself—this was ultimately done by the people of Australia. Kerr’s intervention simply provided the opportunity for this change. Notably, this outcome was a consequence, not the driving reason, behind his decision.
Anticipated Reactions to the Anniversary
The anniversary is expected to trigger intensified criticism of Sir John Kerr. A comprehensive renewed attack is taking shape through three main channels:
- A new biography of then-Prime Minister Gough Whitlam
- A Sky News Australia documentary
- An extensive event organized by the Museum of Australian Democracy, live-streamed from Old Parliament House
Partisan Perspectives at the Commemoration
The day-long event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, will feature prominent figures such as journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, alongside academic Professor Jenny Hocking—all known critics of Sir John Kerr. Most participants are aligned with the Labor Party, suggesting a strong partisan angle.
"Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so. And more importantly, that was a by-product of – not the motivation for – his decision."
On this significant day, the parliamentary precinct is expected to be immersed in heated debate and controversy.
Author’s summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s dismissal of the Whitlam government will reignite fierce partisan debates, highlighting the complex legacy of his constitutional intervention.